linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Xen bugfixes for -rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49E3AD58.2020700@goop.org>
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:23:36 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Xen bugfixes for -rc1

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> I've pulled it into x86/urgent as well, thanks.
>
> This is a strict subset of the Xen tree i sent to Linus to earlier, 
> right?
>
> The two places where there seems to have been some rebasing 
> complexity is arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h and 
> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c.
>   

Yes, its just the core change without the /sys/hypervisor and 
/dev/xen/evtchn drivers.  The only difference is rebasing it off the 
lazy mmu update preemption changes, which affected xen/mmu.c.  The 
required-features.h change is because 5f241e65 is not yet in mainline 
(but probably should be).

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/