[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1LtUBT-0007kq-HU@closure.thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:59:19 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: blktrace: event traces displayed wrong while ftrace blktrace is active
Hi Li,
Thanks for working on the ftrace blktrace code; I was wondering if you
could take a look at something. While the nop or syscall tracer is
selected ("echo nop > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer"), the
event traces display like this:
<...>-4491 [001] 9556.305696: jbd2_start_commit: dev dm-0:8 transaction 335442
<...>-4491 [001] 9556.305700: jbd2_commit_locking: dev dm-0:8 transaction 335442
<...>-4491 [001] 9556.305713: jbd2_commit_flushing: dev dm-0:8 transaction 335442
<...>-4491 [001] 9556.305720: jbd2_submit_inode_data: dev dm-0 transaction ino 3807454
<...>-4491 [001] 9556.305833: jbd2_commit_logging: dev dm-0:8 transaction 335442
<...>-4491 [000] 9556.307241: jbd2_end_commit: dev dm-0:8 transaction 335442 head 334303
That is, the timestamp information what CPU, what pid, etc., is present.
However, if the blk tracer is active, this information is missing:
jbd2_start_commit: dev dm-0:8 transaction 333227
jbd2_commit_locking: dev dm-0:8 transaction 333227
jbd2_commit_flushing: dev dm-0:8 transaction 333227
jbd2_submit_inode_data: dev dm-0 transaction ino 1466869
jbd2_submit_inode_data: dev dm-0 transaction ino 1310793
jbd2_commit_logging: dev dm-0:8 transaction 333227
jbd2_end_commit: dev dm-0:8 transaction 333227 head 332814
The context information for the blktrace is present:
rm-25433 [001] 9578.307485: 8,18 m N cfq25433 slice expired t=0
rm-25433 [001] 9578.307486: 8,18 m N cfq25433 put_queue
kjournald2-14059 [001] 9579.032457: 8,18 A W 5631242 + 8 <- (8,18) 3671312
kjournald2-14059 [001] 9579.032462: 8,18 Q W 5631242 + 8 [kjournald2]
kjournald2-14059 [001] 9579.032470: 8,18 G W 5631242 + 8 [kjournald2]
It's just the context information for the event traces which are
missing.
Anyway, if you could take a look at this, it would be much appreciated.
Usually I can interpolate the the timestamps from the surrounding
blktrace lines, but it would be nice if I didn't have to do that.
Regards,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists