[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904131950580.3041@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:51:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing, boottrace: Move include/trace/boot.h to
include/linux/boottrace.h
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > The sane thing would be to put event headers into
> > > include/trace/events/ and put more generic/utility headers into
> > > include/trace/.
> > >
> > > Reserving a full subdirectory for one singular purpose is a needless
> > > waste of a nice (and unique) name-space resource.
> >
> > That's fine with me too. I just want the trace points to be easily
> > seen. But by making a sub directory, wont we need to have all
> > users of tracepoints do something like:
> >
> > #include <trace/events/sched.h>
> >
> > That might be fine too.
>
> Yes - it would allow the dropping of the annoyingly repetitive
> _event string from those definition files as well?
The coming patches for modules already does that ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists