[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090413034058.GB11652@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:40:58 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] use smp_call_function_single() in
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
* Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 09:30:02AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> >
> > Impact: fix sysbench(oltp)+mysql 10% regression with 2.6.30-rc1
> >
>
> This, and the other cpufreq related patches in this series look
> sound to me. Given the other non-cpufreq bits in the series, do
> you want to just have these go through Andrew and onto Linus?
the other x86 bits look good to me too. It would be best to do this
via -mm because the regression was introduced from there too so the
'lets do a revert and these patches in the next cycle' versus 'lets
do these fixes right now' decision should be driven from there too.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists