[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090413145159.6E0A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:53:01 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] ftrace: introduce workqueue_handler_exit tracepoint and rename workqueue_execution to workqueue_handler_entry
Subject: [PATCH] ftrace: introduce workqueue_handler_exit tracepoint and rename workqueue_execution to workqueue_handler_entry
Entry/exit handler pair is useful common tracepoint technique. it can mesure handler consumption time.
Then, workqueue also handler-exit tracepoint and rename execution to handler-entry.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
include/trace/workqueue_event_types.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c | 10 +++++-----
kernel/workqueue.c | 6 ++++--
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: b/include/trace/workqueue_event_types.h
===================================================================
--- a/include/trace/workqueue_event_types.h 2009-04-13 13:10:27.000000000 +0900
+++ b/include/trace/workqueue_event_types.h 2009-04-13 13:10:27.000000000 +0900
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_insertion,
__entry->thread_pid, __entry->func)
);
-TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_execution,
+TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_handler_entry,
TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *wq_thread, struct work_struct *work),
@@ -56,6 +56,29 @@ TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_execution,
__entry->thread_pid, __entry->func)
);
+TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_handler_exit,
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *wq_thread, struct work_struct *work),
+
+ TP_ARGS(wq_thread, work),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array(char, thread_comm, TASK_COMM_LEN)
+ __field(pid_t, thread_pid)
+ __field(struct work_struct *, work)
+ __field(work_func_t, func)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ memcpy(__entry->thread_comm, wq_thread->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+ __entry->thread_pid = wq_thread->pid;
+ __entry->work = work;
+ __entry->func = work->func;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("thread=%s:%d func=%pF", __entry->thread_comm,
+ __entry->thread_pid, __entry->func)
+);
+
/* Trace the creation of one workqueue thread on a cpu */
TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_creation,
Index: b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c 2009-04-13 13:10:19.000000000 +0900
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c 2009-04-13 13:12:36.000000000 +0900
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ found:
/* Execution of a work */
static void
-probe_workqueue_execution(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
+probe_workqueue_entry(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
struct work_struct *work)
{
int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
@@ -255,13 +255,13 @@ int __init trace_workqueue_early_init(vo
if (ret)
goto out;
- ret = register_trace_workqueue_execution(probe_workqueue_execution);
+ ret = register_trace_workqueue_handler_entry(probe_workqueue_entry);
if (ret)
goto no_insertion;
ret = register_trace_workqueue_creation(probe_workqueue_creation);
if (ret)
- goto no_execution;
+ goto no_handler_entry;
ret = register_trace_workqueue_destruction(probe_workqueue_destruction);
if (ret)
@@ -276,8 +276,8 @@ int __init trace_workqueue_early_init(vo
no_creation:
unregister_trace_workqueue_creation(probe_workqueue_creation);
-no_execution:
- unregister_trace_workqueue_execution(probe_workqueue_execution);
+no_handler_entry:
+ unregister_trace_workqueue_handler_entry(probe_workqueue_entry);
no_insertion:
unregister_trace_workqueue_insertion(probe_workqueue_insertion);
out:
Index: b/kernel/workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c 2009-04-13 13:06:36.000000000 +0900
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c 2009-04-13 13:14:15.000000000 +0900
@@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ int queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struc
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(queue_delayed_work_on);
-DEFINE_TRACE(workqueue_execution);
+DEFINE_TRACE(workqueue_handler_entry);
+DEFINE_TRACE(workqueue_handler_exit);
static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
{
@@ -282,7 +283,6 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_wor
*/
struct lockdep_map lockdep_map = work->lockdep_map;
#endif
- trace_workqueue_execution(cwq->thread, work);
cwq->current_work = work;
list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next);
spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
@@ -291,7 +291,9 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_wor
work_clear_pending(work);
lock_map_acquire(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
lock_map_acquire(&lockdep_map);
+ trace_workqueue_handler_entry(cwq->thread, work);
f(work);
+ trace_workqueue_handler_exit(cwq->thread, work);
lock_map_release(&lockdep_map);
lock_map_release(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists