lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:53:01 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] ftrace: introduce workqueue_handler_exit tracepoint and rename workqueue_execution to workqueue_handler_entry

Subject: [PATCH] ftrace: introduce workqueue_handler_exit tracepoint and rename workqueue_execution to workqueue_handler_entry

Entry/exit handler pair is useful common tracepoint technique. it can mesure handler consumption time.

Then, workqueue also handler-exit tracepoint and rename execution to handler-entry.


Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
 include/trace/workqueue_event_types.h |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c        |   10 +++++-----
 kernel/workqueue.c                    |    6 ++++--
 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: b/include/trace/workqueue_event_types.h
===================================================================
--- a/include/trace/workqueue_event_types.h	2009-04-13 13:10:27.000000000 +0900
+++ b/include/trace/workqueue_event_types.h	2009-04-13 13:10:27.000000000 +0900
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_insertion,
 		__entry->thread_pid, __entry->func)
 );
 
-TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_execution,
+TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_handler_entry,
 
 	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *wq_thread, struct work_struct *work),
 
@@ -56,6 +56,29 @@ TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_execution,
 		__entry->thread_pid, __entry->func)
 );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_handler_exit,
+	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *wq_thread, struct work_struct *work),
+
+	TP_ARGS(wq_thread, work),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__array(char,			thread_comm, TASK_COMM_LEN)
+		__field(pid_t,			thread_pid)
+		__field(struct work_struct *,	work)
+		__field(work_func_t,		func)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		memcpy(__entry->thread_comm, wq_thread->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+		__entry->thread_pid	= wq_thread->pid;
+		__entry->work		= work;
+		__entry->func		= work->func;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("thread=%s:%d func=%pF", __entry->thread_comm,
+		  __entry->thread_pid, __entry->func)
+);
+
 /* Trace the creation of one workqueue thread on a cpu */
 TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_creation,
 
Index: b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c	2009-04-13 13:10:19.000000000 +0900
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c	2009-04-13 13:12:36.000000000 +0900
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ found:
 
 /* Execution of a work */
 static void
-probe_workqueue_execution(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
+probe_workqueue_entry(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
 			  struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
@@ -255,13 +255,13 @@ int __init trace_workqueue_early_init(vo
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = register_trace_workqueue_execution(probe_workqueue_execution);
+	ret = register_trace_workqueue_handler_entry(probe_workqueue_entry);
 	if (ret)
 		goto no_insertion;
 
 	ret = register_trace_workqueue_creation(probe_workqueue_creation);
 	if (ret)
-		goto no_execution;
+		goto no_handler_entry;
 
 	ret = register_trace_workqueue_destruction(probe_workqueue_destruction);
 	if (ret)
@@ -276,8 +276,8 @@ int __init trace_workqueue_early_init(vo
 
 no_creation:
 	unregister_trace_workqueue_creation(probe_workqueue_creation);
-no_execution:
-	unregister_trace_workqueue_execution(probe_workqueue_execution);
+no_handler_entry:
+	unregister_trace_workqueue_handler_entry(probe_workqueue_entry);
 no_insertion:
 	unregister_trace_workqueue_insertion(probe_workqueue_insertion);
 out:
Index: b/kernel/workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c	2009-04-13 13:06:36.000000000 +0900
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c	2009-04-13 13:14:15.000000000 +0900
@@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ int queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struc
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(queue_delayed_work_on);
 
-DEFINE_TRACE(workqueue_execution);
+DEFINE_TRACE(workqueue_handler_entry);
+DEFINE_TRACE(workqueue_handler_exit);
 
 static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
 {
@@ -282,7 +283,6 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_wor
 		 */
 		struct lockdep_map lockdep_map = work->lockdep_map;
 #endif
-		trace_workqueue_execution(cwq->thread, work);
 		cwq->current_work = work;
 		list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
@@ -291,7 +291,9 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_wor
 		work_clear_pending(work);
 		lock_map_acquire(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
 		lock_map_acquire(&lockdep_map);
+		trace_workqueue_handler_entry(cwq->thread, work);
 		f(work);
+		trace_workqueue_handler_exit(cwq->thread, work);
 		lock_map_release(&lockdep_map);
 		lock_map_release(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ