[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090414094852Q.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:49:05 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jaswinder@...nel.org, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
jaswinderrajput@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: pci-swiotlb.c swiotlb_dma_ops should be
static
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:12:52 GMT
tip-bot for Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
> Commit-ID: 49cc21f93ddc4c17c2be77d9da43a2db69acc0d3
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/49cc21f93ddc4c17c2be77d9da43a2db69acc0d3
> Author: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
> AuthorDate: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:24:21 +0530
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CommitDate: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:35:11 +0200
>
> x86: pci-swiotlb.c swiotlb_dma_ops should be static
>
> Impact: reduce kernel size a bit, address sparse warning
>
> Addresses the problem pointed out by this sparse warning:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:53:20: warning: symbol 'swiotlb_dma_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> For x86: swiotlb_dma_ops can be static, because it's not used outside
> of pci-swiotlb.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
> Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> LKML-Reference: <1239558861.3938.2.camel@...alhost.localdomain>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Well, this patch is fine for now. But all the users of swiotlb uses
struct dma_map_ops now so I plan to remove the arch's dma_map_ops
swiotlb_dma_ops.
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> index 34f12e9..221a385 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
> return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(hwdev, size, dma_handle, flags);
> }
>
> -struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
> +static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
> .mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
> .alloc_coherent = x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent,
> .free_coherent = swiotlb_free_coherent,
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists