[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090414102754.GH3558@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:27:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/lockdep: turn lock->name into an array
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:42 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > +#define LOCK_NAME_SIZE 25
> >
> >
> >
> > This constant may look a bit weird.
> > I just started with the assumption that a full lock name
> > will rarely exceed this length.
> >
> > If you agree with it, I will expand the conversion of lockdep
> > TRACE_FORMAT to TRACE_EVENTS with the same assumption.
> > So that we will be able to use filters with locks events.
>
> I really really hate this.
>
> if you pick a size on the top end so that all lock->name's fit in,
> you're wasting heaps of space, if you pick a median length,
> everything will get truncated.
>
> If you're going to do a copy, just do the print into the buffer by
> using _FORMAT and be done with it.
what i suggested was a variable length field. That solves the size
issue. The ring-buffer supports variable size records anyway.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists