[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6a2187b0904140951r3c6a41fdnc26b149202bdfa84@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:51:59 +0800
From: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, paulus@...ba.org,
mingo@...e.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
jengelh@...ozas.de, r000n@...0n.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:23:33 +0200
>> Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Patrick McHardy a écrit :
>>>> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>>> This is an alternative version of ip/ip6/arp tables locking using
>>>>> per-cpu locks. This avoids the overhead of synchronize_net() during
>>>>> update but still removes the expensive rwlock in earlier versions.
Tested. Loaded as fast as 2.6.29.
> Here is an updated patch ontop of yours, with the smp_wmb() in xt_replace_table() :
Tested as well. Loaded as fast as 2.6.29.
Thanks,
Jeff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists