linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/5] FUSE: make request_wait_answer() wait for ->end() completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1239674662-31318-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:04:20 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, npiggin@...e.de
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] FUSE: make request_wait_answer() wait for ->end() completion

Previously, a request was marked FINISHED before ->end() is executed
and thus request_wait_answer() can return before it's done.  This
patch makes request_wait_answer() wait for ->end() to finish before
returning.

Note that no current ->end() user waits for request completion, so
this change doesn't cause any behavior difference.

While at it, beef up the comment above ->end() hook and clarify when
and where it's called.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 fs/fuse/dev.c    |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 fs/fuse/fuse_i.h |    5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index 2a17249..2e1c43d 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -278,7 +278,6 @@ __releases(&fc->lock)
 	req->end = NULL;
 	list_del(&req->list);
 	list_del(&req->intr_entry);
-	req->state = FUSE_REQ_FINISHED;
 	if (req->background) {
 		if (fc->num_background == FUSE_MAX_BACKGROUND) {
 			fc->blocked = 0;
@@ -293,10 +292,21 @@ __releases(&fc->lock)
 		fc->active_background--;
 		flush_bg_queue(fc);
 	}
+
 	spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
-	wake_up(&req->waitq);
-	if (end)
+
+	if (end) {
 		end(fc, req);
+		smp_wmb();
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * We own this request and wake_up() has enough memory
+	 * barrier, no need to grab spin lock to set state.
+	 */
+	req->state = FUSE_REQ_FINISHED;
+
+	wake_up(&req->waitq);
 	fuse_put_request(fc, req);
 }
 
@@ -372,17 +382,16 @@ __acquires(&fc->lock)
 		return;
 
  aborted:
-	BUG_ON(req->state != FUSE_REQ_FINISHED);
-	if (req->locked) {
-		/* This is uninterruptible sleep, because data is
-		   being copied to/from the buffers of req.  During
-		   locked state, there mustn't be any filesystem
-		   operation (e.g. page fault), since that could lead
-		   to deadlock */
-		spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
-		wait_event(req->waitq, !req->locked);
-		spin_lock(&fc->lock);
-	}
+	spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
+	wait_event(req->waitq, req->state == FUSE_REQ_FINISHED);
+	/*
+	 * This is uninterruptible sleep, because data is being copied
+	 * to/from the buffers of req.  During locked state, there
+	 * mustn't be any filesystem operation (e.g. page fault),
+	 * since that could lead to deadlock
+	 */
+	wait_event(req->waitq, !req->locked);
+	spin_lock(&fc->lock);
 }
 
 void fuse_request_send(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
@@ -1060,9 +1069,7 @@ __acquires(&fc->lock)
 
 		req->aborted = 1;
 		req->out.h.error = -ECONNABORTED;
-		req->state = FUSE_REQ_FINISHED;
 		list_del_init(&req->list);
-		wake_up(&req->waitq);
 		if (end) {
 			req->end = NULL;
 			__fuse_get_request(req);
@@ -1072,6 +1079,8 @@ __acquires(&fc->lock)
 			fuse_put_request(fc, req);
 			spin_lock(&fc->lock);
 		}
+		req->state = FUSE_REQ_FINISHED;
+		wake_up(&req->waitq);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
index cdab92d..4da979c 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
+++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
@@ -291,7 +291,10 @@ struct fuse_req {
 	/** Link on fi->writepages */
 	struct list_head writepages_entry;
 
-	/** Request completion callback */
+	/** Request completion callback.  This function is called from
+	    the kernel context of the FUSE server if the request isn't
+	    being aborted.  If the request is being aborted, it's
+	    called from the kernel context of the aborting process. */
 	void (*end)(struct fuse_conn *, struct fuse_req *);
 
 	/** Request is stolen from fuse_file->reserved_req */
-- 
1.6.0.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/