[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090414141125.53af6fdc@nehalam>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:11:25 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, paulus@...ba.org,
mingo@...e.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
jengelh@...ozas.de, r000n@...0n.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v2)
> Oh well, it seems factorization of this stuff is not what you want, so
> I'll stop arguing.
That's no fun.. I didn't mind the refactorizing, but was concerned
that it caused the locking to be out of line in fast path.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists