[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1239742000.24204.9.camel@ice-age>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:46:40 +0200
From: Eric Leblond <eric@....fr>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: panic on rmmod of nf_conntrack_irc
Hi,
Le mardi 14 avril 2009 à 22:14 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Mariusz Kozlowski a écrit :
> > On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:16:37 +0200
> > Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> Patrick McHardy a écrit :
> >>>> Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>>> netfilter: nf_conntrack: use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU and get rid of
> >>>>> call_rcu()
> >>>> Thanks for the report. Does this patch fix it?
> >>>>
> >>> Hi Patrick, sorry for the delay, I was in holidays.
> >> No problem, me too :)
> >>
...
>
> Check commit ca735b3aaa945626ba65a3e51145bfe4ecd9e222
>
> netfilter: use a linked list of loggers
...
> Signed-off-by: Eric Leblond <eric@....fr>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>
> It seems "struct list_head list[NFPROTO_NUMPROTO];" is not initialized in "struct nf_logger" ?
>
> Please try following patch ?
I've just tested your patch. Without it, I was able to trigger the bug
(modprobe ebt_ulog ; rmmod ebt_ulog). All run cleanly with it.
All my apologies for having forgot to do this test.
BR,
--
Eric Leblond <eric@....fr>
INL: http://www.inl.fr/
NuFW: http://www.nufw.org/
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists