[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090414213207.GP955@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:32:07 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: blktrace: event traces displayed wrong while ftrace blktrace
is active
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:25:33PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> Indeed. Note that you can overwrite this default by typing:
>
> echo context-info > trace_option
>
> after setting bkltrace as the current tracer.
The problem with doing that is that blktrace will then display this:
fsync-tester-27934 [001] 208.031278: fsync-tester-27934 [001] 208.031278: 254,4 Q WS 268392 + 8 [fsync-tester]
I think the real problem is that blk trace is displaying the standard
context-info, so it's suppressing the normal context info. So I have
the choice on having no context information on my event trace lines,
or two copies of the context information for the block trace lines.
:-(
I'm guessing things were done this way in order to support the old
legancy blktrace format?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists