[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090414002403.GM5977@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:24:04 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/lockdep: turn lock->name into an array
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 01:01:10AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > - __field(const char *, name)
> > + __array(char, name, LOCK_NAME_SIZE)
> > __field(unsigned long, wait_usec)
> > __field(unsigned long, wait_nsec_rem)
> > ),
>
> Hm. These constants tend to grow - 25 will certainly be too narrow.
> But increasing it increases the record size as well.
Yeah, that's why I'm not sure about the right size.
> I think we'll need an embedded __string() type, with a length field
> (but still also zero-delimited, for convenience), hm?
Indeed. It tends to be a repetitive pattern.
Also, may be we can use an undefined array size on the structure
for the __string field.
We already do so with the old style trace_printk entry and may be
some others. Extending TRACE_EVENT to support it shouldn't be a big deal.
I'll just wait for Steven changes and try to do that.
> Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists