[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E424A3.60606@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:52:35 -0400
From: Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
CC: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, xemul@...allels.com,
dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu, hch@...radead.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/30] cr: core stuff
Hi,
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@...il.com):
>
> Hi Alexey,
>
> as far as I can see, the main differences between this patch and the
> equivalent in Oren's tree are:
>
> 1. kernel auto-selects container init to freeze
Actually, this eliminates the possibility to checkpoint a subtree of
tasks, which (under some obvious constraints) can be a handy feature.
> 2. kernel freezes tasks
IMHO better to do it in userspace - that way userspace can accomplish
other tasks while tasks are frozen, such as snapshot the filesystem,
or block/unblock the network.
Is there a good argument to do it kernel ?
> 3. no objhash taking references
> 4. no hbuf
> 5. always require CAP_SYS_ADMIN
I'm now convinced (thanks, Serge!) that it's better not to require
this unless we strictly have to.
Oren.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists