[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090415131009.AC40.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:12:56 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric B Munson <ebmunson@...ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: meminfo Committed_AS underflows
fix stupid mistake.
Changelog:
since v1
- change the type of commited value from ulong to long
=========================
Subject: [PATCH v2] fix Commited_AS underflow
Dave Hansen reported committed_AS field can underfolow.
> # while true; do cat /proc/meminfo | grep _AS; sleep 1; done | uniq -c
> 1 Committed_AS: 18446744073709323392 kB
> 11 Committed_AS: 18446744073709455488 kB
> 6 Committed_AS: 35136 kB
> 5 Committed_AS: 18446744073709454400 kB
> 7 Committed_AS: 35904 kB
> 3 Committed_AS: 18446744073709453248 kB
> 2 Committed_AS: 34752 kB
> 9 Committed_AS: 18446744073709453248 kB
> 8 Committed_AS: 34752 kB
> 3 Committed_AS: 18446744073709320960 kB
> 7 Committed_AS: 18446744073709454080 kB
> 3 Committed_AS: 18446744073709320960 kB
> 5 Committed_AS: 18446744073709454080 kB
> 6 Committed_AS: 18446744073709320960 kB
Because NR_CPU can be greater than 1000. and meminfo_proc_show()
doesn't have underflow check.
this patch have two change.
1. Change NR_CPU to nr_online_cpus()
vm_acct_memory() isn't fast-path. then cpumask_weight() calculation
isn't so expensive and the parameter for scalability issue should
consider number of _physical_ cpus. not theoretical maximum number.
2. Add under-flow check to meminfo_proc_show().
Almost field in /proc/meminfo have underflow check. but Committed_AS
is significant exeption.
it should do.
Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
---
fs/proc/meminfo.c | 4 +++-
mm/swap.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: b/fs/proc/meminfo.c
===================================================================
--- a/fs/proc/meminfo.c
+++ b/fs/proc/meminfo.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ void __attribute__((weak)) arch_report_m
static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
struct sysinfo i;
- unsigned long committed;
+ long committed;
unsigned long allowed;
struct vmalloc_info vmi;
long cached;
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_
si_meminfo(&i);
si_swapinfo(&i);
committed = atomic_long_read(&vm_committed_space);
+ if (committed < 0)
+ committed = 0;
allowed = ((totalram_pages - hugetlb_total_pages())
* sysctl_overcommit_ratio / 100) + total_swap_pages;
Index: b/mm/swap.c
===================================================================
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pagevec_lookup_tag);
* We tolerate a little inaccuracy to avoid ping-ponging the counter between
* CPUs
*/
-#define ACCT_THRESHOLD max(16, NR_CPUS * 2)
+#define ACCT_THRESHOLD max_t(long, 16, num_online_cpus() * 2)
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, committed_space);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists