[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090415062702.GP5178@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:27:02 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tiobench read 50% regression with 2.6.30-rc1
On Wed, Apr 15 2009, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 14:14 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10 2009, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 11:57 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 09 2009, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > > > Comparing with 2.6.29's result, tiobench (read) has about 50% regression
> > > > > with 2.6.30-rc1 on all my machines. Bisect down to below patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > b029195dda0129b427c6e579a3bb3ae752da3a93 is first bad commit
> > > > > commit b029195dda0129b427c6e579a3bb3ae752da3a93
> > > > > Author: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> > > > > Date: Tue Apr 7 11:38:31 2009 +0200
>
> > > >
> > > > It's not a huge surprise that we regressed there. I'll get this fixed up
> > > > next week. Can you I talk you into trying to change the 'quantum' sysfs
> > > > variable for the drive? It's in /sys/block/xxx/queue/iosched where xxx
> > > > is your drive(s). It's set to 4, if you could try progressively larger
> > > > settings and retest, that would help get things started.
> > > I tried 4,8,16,64,128 and didn't find result difference.
> >
> > Can you try with this patch?
> The new patch does fix it.
Great, thanks for retesting.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists