[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090415154059.AC49.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:47:24 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tracing, workqueuetrace: Make workqueue tracepoints use TRACE_EVENT macro
Hi
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + memcpy(__entry->thread_comm, wq_thread->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
>
>
>
> This is not about your patch but I see this pattern happen often. We should
> start think about a way to use tracing_record_cmdline for that.
I guess two movq isn't expensive than tracing_record_cmdline ;)
> > + TP_printk("thread=%s:%d work=%p func=%p", __entry->thread_comm,
>
> These pointer addresses are not very useful to display.
> We can zap work and display the func as a %pF.
>
> Not related to your patch: only the name of the func is useful,
> not its asm offset. A format for raw func name without offset would
> start to become very handy. I remember Andrew talked about that by the past.
>
> I wonder which format we could use for that. %pf ?
perhaps, static function need offset...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists