lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090415074659.GA21764@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:46:59 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING breaks gcc warnings

> > 
> > This has been mentioned before, and I've asked about sending a 
> > patch that would prevent TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING from being 
> > selected with an allyesconfig.
> > 
> > It is easy to do. I could make it a selection and not a boolean 
> > and it will not select it as default, even for allyes/modconfig

We should have a symbol that is only set for allyesconfig builds.

Then we could do something like:

config TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING
	depends on !ALLYESCONFIG

The advantage is that it is obvious why we have defiend
it like this rather than some inverse symbols.

I looked at generating such symbol in kconfig long time
ago but never finished it.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ