[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090415095710.5c853a7f@hskinnemoen-d830>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:57:10 +0200
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
hskinnemoen@...el.com, kernel@...32linux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imre.deak@...ia.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] threaded interrupt handler support breaks (some)
irq handling on AVR32
Ben Nizette wrote:
> static irqreturn_t ads7846_irq(int irq, void *handle)
> {
> struct ads7846 *ts = handle;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ts->lock, flags);
> if (likely(get_pendown_state(ts))) {
> if (!ts->irq_disabled) {
> /* The ARM do_simple_IRQ() dispatcher doesn't act
> * like the other dispatchers: it will report IRQs
> * even after they've been disabled. We work around
> * that here. (The "generic irq" framework may help...)
> */
> ts->irq_disabled = 1;
> disable_irq(ts->spi->irq);
Shouldn't that be disable_irq_nosync()?
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists