[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E5B9BD.5070204@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:41:01 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: dada1@...mosbay.com, jpirko@...hat.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, fubar@...ibm.com,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, mschmidt@...hat.com,
ivecera@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: introduce a list of device addresses dev_addr_list
David Miller wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:13:57 +0200
>
>> David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:27:50 +0200
>>>
>>>> Since you obviously need a write lock here to be sure following
>>>> can be done by one cpu only.
>>>>
>>>> You have same problem all over this patch.
>>> RTNL semaphore is held across all modification operations.
>> If this will also be used for multicast lists, changes can happen
>> (IPv6) without the RTNL.
>
> Indeed, that is true :-/
Herbert (I think) suggested to make address list updates in softirq
context a two-step process, where addresses would first be added to
a temporary list and the final change would be done in process context
while holding the RTNL.
Given the complicated mess we currently have, this would be a very
worthwhile change IMO.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists