[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1239805420.21121.72.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:23:40 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: enlarge RB_MAX_SMALL_DATA
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 16:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com> wrote:
> Yeah - format specifications are always good. They weaken ABI
> bindings and allow more flexibility both on the tool and the kernel
> side.
>
> > We could ask Linus to pull this into 30 because it is a API
> > change.
>
> Apps could assume if the format file is not there it's the .30
> format.
My fear is that they are written before the change, and will not know
about a format file existing. Then those apps will break on 31.
But this is still new, and the only user I know of at the moment is the
University student doing the ftrace GUI. I'll keep him informed.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists