| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200904160011.14645.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:11:14 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: lguest@...abs.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] lguest: don't expect linear addresses in gdt pvops
Impact: fix guest crash 'lguest: bad read address 0x4800000 len 256'
The new per-cpu allocator ends up handing a non-linear address to
write_gdt_entry. We do __pa() on it, and hand it to the host, which
kills us.
I've long wanted to make the hypercall "LOAD_GDT_ENTRY" to match the IDT
code, but had no pressing reason until now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: lguest@...abs.org
---
arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/lguest/boot.c | 16 +++++++++-------
drivers/lguest/lg.h | 3 ++-
drivers/lguest/segments.c | 13 +++++++------
drivers/lguest/x86/core.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/lguest_hcall.h
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
#define LHCALL_FLUSH_ASYNC 0
#define LHCALL_LGUEST_INIT 1
#define LHCALL_SHUTDOWN 2
-#define LHCALL_LOAD_GDT 3
#define LHCALL_NEW_PGTABLE 4
#define LHCALL_FLUSH_TLB 5
#define LHCALL_LOAD_IDT_ENTRY 6
@@ -17,6 +16,7 @@
#define LHCALL_SET_PMD 15
#define LHCALL_LOAD_TLS 16
#define LHCALL_NOTIFY 17
+#define LHCALL_LOAD_GDT_ENTRY 18
#define LGUEST_TRAP_ENTRY 0x1F
diff --git a/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c b/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
--- a/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
@@ -273,15 +273,15 @@ static void lguest_load_idt(const struct
* controls the entire thing and the Guest asks it to make changes using the
* LOAD_GDT hypercall.
*
- * This is the opposite of the IDT code where we have a LOAD_IDT_ENTRY
- * hypercall and use that repeatedly to load a new IDT. I don't think it
- * really matters, but wouldn't it be nice if they were the same? Wouldn't
- * it be even better if you were the one to send the patch to fix it?
+ * This is the exactly like the IDT code.
*/
static void lguest_load_gdt(const struct desc_ptr *desc)
{
- BUG_ON((desc->size + 1) / 8 != GDT_ENTRIES);
- kvm_hypercall2(LHCALL_LOAD_GDT, __pa(desc->address), GDT_ENTRIES);
+ unsigned int i;
+ struct desc_struct *gdt = (void *)desc->address;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < (desc->size+1)/8; i++)
+ kvm_hypercall3(LHCALL_LOAD_GDT_ENTRY, i, gdt[i].a, gdt[i].b);
}
/* For a single GDT entry which changes, we do the lazy thing: alter our GDT,
@@ -291,7 +291,9 @@ static void lguest_write_gdt_entry(struc
const void *desc, int type)
{
native_write_gdt_entry(dt, entrynum, desc, type);
- kvm_hypercall2(LHCALL_LOAD_GDT, __pa(dt), GDT_ENTRIES);
+ /* Tell Host about this new entry. */
+ kvm_hypercall3(LHCALL_LOAD_GDT_ENTRY, entrynum,
+ dt[entrynum].a, dt[entrynum].b);
}
/* OK, I lied. There are three "thread local storage" GDT entries which change
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/lg.h b/drivers/lguest/lg.h
--- a/drivers/lguest/lg.h
+++ b/drivers/lguest/lg.h
@@ -158,7 +158,8 @@ void free_interrupts(void);
/* segments.c: */
void setup_default_gdt_entries(struct lguest_ro_state *state);
void setup_guest_gdt(struct lg_cpu *cpu);
-void load_guest_gdt(struct lg_cpu *cpu, unsigned long table, u32 num);
+void load_guest_gdt_entry(struct lg_cpu *cpu, unsigned int i,
+ u32 low, u32 hi);
void guest_load_tls(struct lg_cpu *cpu, unsigned long tls_array);
void copy_gdt(const struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct desc_struct *gdt);
void copy_gdt_tls(const struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct desc_struct *gdt);
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/segments.c b/drivers/lguest/segments.c
--- a/drivers/lguest/segments.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/segments.c
@@ -144,18 +144,19 @@ void copy_gdt(const struct lg_cpu *cpu,
gdt[i] = cpu->arch.gdt[i];
}
-/*H:620 This is where the Guest asks us to load a new GDT (LHCALL_LOAD_GDT).
- * We copy it from the Guest and tweak the entries. */
-void load_guest_gdt(struct lg_cpu *cpu, unsigned long table, u32 num)
+/*H:620 This is where the Guest asks us to load a new GDT entry
+ * (LHCALL_LOAD_GDT_ENTRY). We tweak the entry and copy it in. */
+void load_guest_gdt_entry(struct lg_cpu *cpu, u32 num, u32 lo, u32 hi)
{
/* We assume the Guest has the same number of GDT entries as the
* Host, otherwise we'd have to dynamically allocate the Guest GDT. */
if (num > ARRAY_SIZE(cpu->arch.gdt))
kill_guest(cpu, "too many gdt entries %i", num);
- /* We read the whole thing in, then fix it up. */
- __lgread(cpu, cpu->arch.gdt, table, num * sizeof(cpu->arch.gdt[0]));
- fixup_gdt_table(cpu, 0, ARRAY_SIZE(cpu->arch.gdt));
+ /* Set it up, then fix it. */
+ cpu->arch.gdt[num].a = lo;
+ cpu->arch.gdt[num].b = hi;
+ fixup_gdt_table(cpu, num, num+1);
/* Mark that the GDT changed so the core knows it has to copy it again,
* even if the Guest is run on the same CPU. */
cpu->changed |= CHANGED_GDT;
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c b/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c
--- a/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c
@@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ void __exit lguest_arch_host_fini(void)
int lguest_arch_do_hcall(struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct hcall_args *args)
{
switch (args->arg0) {
- case LHCALL_LOAD_GDT:
- load_guest_gdt(cpu, args->arg1, args->arg2);
+ case LHCALL_LOAD_GDT_ENTRY:
+ load_guest_gdt_entry(cpu, args->arg1, args->arg2, args->arg3);
break;
case LHCALL_LOAD_IDT_ENTRY:
load_guest_idt_entry(cpu, args->arg1, args->arg2, args->arg3);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists