[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E641D4.2000604@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:21:40 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, henrix@...o.pt
Subject: Re: Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> I've been struggling trying to find the cause of a regression in
>>> 30-rc1 (compared to 2.6.29) where I am no longer able to make-install a
>>> kernel via an NFS mounted home directory.
>>>
>>> Historically I do all of my kernel development/building on one machine
>>> and then I have a bunch of test machines that are NIS/NFS clients of
>>> that machine that have the same /home mounted. When I am ready to
>>> deploy a kernel, I log into that machine and su to root to simply "make
>>> modules_install && make install" the kernel. This has always worked
>>> until recently. I started getting this message:
>>>
>>> INSTALL sound/usb/caiaq/snd-usb-caiaq.ko
>>> INSTALL sound/usb/snd-usb-audio.ko
>>> INSTALL sound/usb/snd-usb-lib.ko
>>> INSTALL sound/usb/usx2y/snd-usb-usx2y.ko
>>> DEPMOD 2.6.30-rc1-vbus
>>> rm: cannot remove `include/config/kernel.release': Permission denied
>>> make: *** [include/config/kernel.release] Error 1
>>>
>>> I understand what is going on w.r.t. the root shell having permisssion
>>> problems modifying data on an NFS mount. However, this _used_ to work
>>> so I started investigating for what I thought would be a minor change to
>>> kbuild that I could patch. At first I simply just hacked the makefile
>>> to make the kernel.release stuff use the "-" to ignore the error. This
>>> did manage to get me past the initial problem, but then I immediately
>>> ran into more problems related to the generation of version.h and
>>> version.h.tmp as well.
>>>
>>> Looking into this, I couldnt track down where the "filechk" magic was
>>> coming from (any hints from the kbuild gurus?). So I thought that I
filechk is defined in scripts/Kbuild.include .
>>> would try to bisect the issue. However, that failed to produce a bad
>>> commit for reasons that I do not quite understand either. Here is the
>>> git-bisect log:
>>>
>>> git bisect start
>>> # good: [8e0ee43bc2c3e19db56a4adaa9a9b04ce885cd84] Linux 2.6.29
>>> git bisect good 8e0ee43bc2c3e19db56a4adaa9a9b04ce885cd84
>>> # bad: [b21597d0268983f8f9e8b563494f75490403e948] Merge branch
>>> 'for-linus' of
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6
>>> git bisect bad b21597d0268983f8f9e8b563494f75490403e948
>>> # good: [7f6adeaf2d8800b66c5dd6c2cf2622dfdd68bd31] V4L/DVB (10730):
>>> v4l-dvb: cleanup obsolete references to v4l1 headers.
>>> git bisect good 7f6adeaf2d8800b66c5dd6c2cf2622dfdd68bd31
>>> # good: [18222f98223a00537bcf29ba74c8d5fdb3ae1fb8] Staging: comedi: add
>>> ssv_dnp driver
>>> git bisect good 18222f98223a00537bcf29ba74c8d5fdb3ae1fb8
>>> # bad: [32fb6c17566ec66de87324a834c7776f40e35e78] Merge branch 'release'
>>> of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6
>>> git bisect bad 32fb6c17566ec66de87324a834c7776f40e35e78
>>> # bad: [714f83d5d9f7c785f622259dad1f4fad12d64664] Merge branch
>>> 'tracing-for-linus' of
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip
>>> git bisect bad 714f83d5d9f7c785f622259dad1f4fad12d64664
>>> # good: [6404434525bb9f8f2239998f30fd7c93f2efa5b3] tracing/syscalls:
>>> various cleanups
>>> git bisect good 6404434525bb9f8f2239998f30fd7c93f2efa5b3
>>> # bad: [0a053e8c71d666daf30da2d407147b1293923d8b] Merge branch
>>> 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/drzeus/mmc
>>> git bisect bad 0a053e8c71d666daf30da2d407147b1293923d8b
>>> # bad: [811158b147a503fbdf9773224004ffd32002d1fe] Merge branch
>>> 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/trivial
>>> git bisect bad 811158b147a503fbdf9773224004ffd32002d1fe
>>> # bad: [b983471794e568fd71fa767da77a62ba517c3e63] Merge
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable
>>> git bisect bad b983471794e568fd71fa767da77a62ba517c3e63
>>> # bad: [9140db04ef185f934acf2b1b15b3dd5e6a6bfc22] ocfs2: recover orphans
>>> in offline slots during recovery and mount
>>> git bisect bad 9140db04ef185f934acf2b1b15b3dd5e6a6bfc22
>>> # bad: [feb473a6e8bd19297d0f3bb377b25055c0228c0a] ocfs2: Optimize inode
>>> group allocation by recording last used group.
>>> git bisect bad feb473a6e8bd19297d0f3bb377b25055c0228c0a
>>> # bad: [e7c17e43090afe558c40bfb66637744c27bd2aeb] ocfs2: Introduce dir
>>> free space list
>>> git bisect bad e7c17e43090afe558c40bfb66637744c27bd2aeb
>>> # bad: [59b526a30722f29e5dba6210a6e0fc34e3149b94] ocfs2: Remove debugfs
>>> file local_alloc_stats
>>> git bisect bad 59b526a30722f29e5dba6210a6e0fc34e3149b94
>>> # bad: [96a6c64b5354b804b3ccfd1b31306565a01ebcb1] ocfs2: Move struct
>>> recovery_map to a header file
>>> git bisect bad 96a6c64b5354b804b3ccfd1b31306565a01ebcb1
>>> # bad: [87d3d3f3931f3e0fca44fbb5c06ad45fc4dca9bc] ocfs2/hb: Expose the
>>> list of heartbeating nodes via debugfs
>>> git bisect bad 87d3d3f3931f3e0fca44fbb5c06ad45fc4dca9bc
>>>
>>> What I dont really understand is that this (I thought) was supposed to
>>> look for where the behavior first appeared between v2.6.29..HEAD, but
>>> some points along the way were actually before v2.6.29 was cut. I don't
>>> really know what went wrong, but if it matters I am running git 1.6.2.
>>>
>>> At this point, I am stuck. Perhaps there is a better methodology to
>>> deploying the kernels that I should employ, but I am not sure which to
>>> use yet. Any help appreciated!
>>>
>>
>> See this patch, already applied/merged:
>>
>> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/556b0f58bbcdc96ba8ed67001b4e57c50198da89
>> Commit: 556b0f58bbcdc96ba8ed67001b4e57c50198da89
>> Parent: 8e320d02718d2872d52ef88a69a493e420494269
>> Author: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
>> AuthorDate: Sat Jan 10 14:53:15 2009 +0000
>> Committer: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
>> CommitDate: Mon Apr 6 14:27:17 2009 -0700
>>
>> Revert "fix modules_install via NFS"
>>
>> This reverts commit 8b249b6856f16f09b0e5b79ce5f4d435e439b9d6.
>>
>> This 'fix' is not necessary; we just need to undo the damage caused
>> accidentally by Igor/Mauro in 4b29631db33292d416dc395c56122ea865e7635c
>> ("V4L/DVB (9533): cx88: Add support for TurboSight TBS8910 DVB-S PCI card")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
>>
>>
>>
> Thanks Randy. I was running on 0882e8dd3aad33eca41696d463bb896e6c8817eb
> so I had these patches all applied. I think you were trying to tell me
> that perhaps a similar fix could be found among these patches, but I was
> unfortunately not able to find any and this is still broken for me.
No, I wasn't trying to say that. Your very first paragraph said
"regression in 30-rc1" and David's patch fixes that problem.
So is there still some other problem in linus-current?
> As a work-around, I wrote the following script to push my kernels out
> over ssh, instead of pulling them in by nfs. FWIW, i'll post it here as
> others have privately told me they are having this same bug in
> make-install affect them as well.
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> #
> # deploykernel - push a kernel to a remote ssh machine
> #
> # Author: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
> #
>
> set -e
>
> if [ -z $1 ]; then
> echo "usage: $0 <remote>"
> exit -1
> fi
>
> tmp=$(mktemp -d)
> rel=$(cat include/config/kernel.release)
>
> echo "Generating module image"
> make modules_install INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$tmp
>
> echo "Transferring modules"
> (cd $tmp; tar -c *) | ssh root@$1 'cd /; tar -xv'
>
> rm -rf $tmp
>
> echo "Transferring kernel"
> tmp=$(ssh root@$1 'mktemp -d')
>
> scp ./arch/x86/boot/bzImage root@$1:$tmp
> scp ./System.map root@$1:$tmp
>
> echo "Installing kernel"
> ssh root@$1 "cd $tmp; /sbin/installkernel $rel bzImage System.map; rm
> -rf $tmp"
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists