linux-kernel - Re: Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49E651A9.8030409@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:29:13 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, henrix@...o.pt
Subject: Re: Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount

Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> The problem seems to be that 30-rcX thinks that there are dependencies
>> to update (such as include/config/kernel.release and version.h.tmp)
>> during a make-install operation.  Since I am on a root-squashed NFS
>> mount, these files cannot be updated and thus the install fails. 
>> Previous trees prior to linux-current (at least up to 2.6.29) did not
>> try to update these files so the install would succeed.
> 
> It is because arch/x86/Makefile has
> a dependency on vmlinux for the install target.
> 
> I know hpa has had a fix for it but it is not applied.
> I recall there was a trivial bug in the first version.
> 

OK, do we have a consensus that this is desirable?  I was somewhat 
confused if it was desired or considered user error.

I'll clean up the patch and add it in the former case.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/