lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904151136.34934.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:36:34 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 10/14] smp: fix cpu_possible_map initialization

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:23:37 pm Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> 
> The cpu_possible_map by default is initialized with all ones in s390.
> If the kernel paramert possible_cpus=<x> is passed the cpu_possible_map
> is supposed to have x bits set.
> However the current code just sets the x bits without clearing the NR_CPUS
> bits that were already set. So we end up with an unchanged map that has
> all bits set.
> To fix this just clear the map before setting any new bits.

You're right; I created this patch back before I did the
CONFIG_INIT_ALL_POSSIBLE patch.

It'd be nice to wean S390 off CONFIG_INIT_ALL_POSSIBLE, then there'd
only be two (parisc and m32r).  But it's a minor wart.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ