[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E657BC.6000707@rtr.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:55:08 -0400
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linux USB kernel mailing list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: USB storage no-boot regression (bisected)
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:37:44 -0400
> Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wrote:
>
>> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:25:05 -0400
>>> Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wrote:
..
>>>> Not forever, just a few seconds to compensate for the regression.
>>> seconds!!!!!
>>> The whole kernel boots in half a second!
>> ..
>>
>> Oh, absolutely I agree.
>>
>> That's why I'm not suggesting a DELAY
>> but rather a TIMEOUT (where it keeps trying up until the timeout).
>
> This exists today. It's just not something Jeff chose to use ;)
> (because he didn't need to)
>
>> For desktop, it should really just wait forever,
>> but I can understand situations (server room)
>> where that would be a Really Bad Idea.
>
> it's called rootwait and such :)
..
No, that's not the same thing.
rootwait has no timeout -- it waits *forever*,
which will break auto-recovery on servers.
We just need it to wait/retry up to a timeout (parameter?).
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists