[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090415224017.GA18764@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:40:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Fix quilt merge error in acpi-cpufreq.c
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Impact line exposes wrong patch structure: cleanup should never be
> > mixed with fix.
> >
> > impact line somewhat atypical but correct - the patch is a cleanup
> > but might affect user-space.
> >
> > Impact line is correct.
> >
> > Impact line is not duplicative of subject line.
> >
> > Impact line is incorrect (describes action not effect).
> >
> > Impact line is correct and appropriate.
>
> Bah.
>
> In _no_ case did the Impact: line actually say anything worth
> saying, and it was there just for self-gratification.
As i said it in the mail, i actually used the impact line of commit
6b44003e5ca66 ("work_on_cpu(): rewrite it to create a kernel thread
on demand") later on, when a regression was caused by that commit.
It is the third entry above.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists