linux-kernel - Re: Fix quilt merge error in acpi-cpufreq.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904151607010.4042@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hpa@...or.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Fix quilt merge error in acpi-cpufreq.c



On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> As i said it in the mail, i actually used the impact line of commit 
> 6b44003e5ca66 ("work_on_cpu(): rewrite it to create a kernel thread 
> on demand") later on, when a regression was caused by that commit.

Duh. You keep on repeating that idiotic argument.

The "Impact:" part had nothing what-so-ever to do with what you argue for.

I'm not arguing against good commit messages. I'm arguing against the 
"Impact:" part. It's pointless.

ALL of the commit message is (hopefully) about important things. If you 
want to narrow it down to one single line, that's just WRONG.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/