[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090415033455.GS7082@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:04:55 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric B Munson <ebmunson@...ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: meminfo Committed_AS underflows
* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> [2009-04-15 11:04:59]:
> committed = atomic_long_read(&vm_committed_space);
> + if (committed < 0)
> + committed = 0;
Isn't this like pushing the problem under the rug?
> allowed = ((totalram_pages - hugetlb_total_pages())
> * sysctl_overcommit_ratio / 100) + total_swap_pages;
>
> Index: b/mm/swap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pagevec_lookup_tag);
> * We tolerate a little inaccuracy to avoid ping-ponging the counter between
> * CPUs
> */
> -#define ACCT_THRESHOLD max(16, NR_CPUS * 2)
> +#define ACCT_THRESHOLD max_t(long, 16, num_online_cpus() * 2)
>
Hmm.. this is a one time expansion, free of CPU hotplug.
Should we use nr_cpu_ids or num_possible_cpus()?
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists