[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1239861245.29831.113.camel@linux-51e8.site>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:54:05 +1000
From: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, Eric Miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>,
linux@....linux.org.uk, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
p_gortmaker@...oo.com, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
pierre@...man.eu, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] Fix unsafe disable_irq usage
After being bitten by unsafe usage of disable_irq from within that irq's
handler [1], I went through and used Coccinelle to audit the rest of
drivers/ too. This turned up 9 more unsafe usages.
As Haavard pointed out in that thread, disable_irq waits for running
handlers of an irq to complete before returning. When a handler
disable_irq's its own irq then we see a deadlock.
Note that this wasn't actually observed in the wild until the recent
merge of
commit 3aa551c9b4c40018f0e261a178e3d25478dc04a9
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Date: Mon Mar 23 18:28:15 2009 +0100
genirq: add threaded interrupt handler support
Add support for threaded interrupt handlers
Regards,
--Ben.
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/15/498
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists