[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1239861283.29831.120.camel@linux-51e8.site>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:54:43 +1000
From: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
To: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] sa1111ps2: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq
handlers.
disable_irq() should wait for all running handlers to complete
before returning. As such, if it's used to disable an interrupt
from that interrupt's handler it will deadlock. This replaces
the dangerous instances with the _nosync() variant which doesn't
have this problem.
Signed-off-by: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/sa1111ps2.c b/drivers/input/serio/sa1111ps2.c
index 57953c0..f412c69 100644
--- a/drivers/input/serio/sa1111ps2.c
+++ b/drivers/input/serio/sa1111ps2.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ps2_txint(int irq, void *dev_id)
spin_lock(&ps2if->lock);
status = sa1111_readl(ps2if->base + SA1111_PS2STAT);
if (ps2if->head == ps2if->tail) {
- disable_irq(irq);
+ disable_irq_nosync(irq);
/* done */
} else if (status & PS2STAT_TXE) {
sa1111_writel(ps2if->buf[ps2if->tail], ps2if->base + SA1111_PS2DATA);
--
1.6.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists