[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E6D085.3050601@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:30:29 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: petkovbb@...il.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
bharrosh@...asas.com, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, bzolnier@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] scsi: replace custom rq mapping with blk_rq_map_kern_sgl()
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 03:07:09PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>> There was another problem. If we use blk_rq_map_kern() the failed rq
>> must be finished after the sense rq is finished because that's when
>> the bio is copied back if it was copied. Before sense_rq completion,
>> the sense buffer doesn't contain any valid data.
>
> Well, as an idea, we could just postpone the completion of the failed rq
> in:
>
> if (sense && uptodate)
> ide_cd_complete_failed_rq(drive, rq);
>
> and put that just after
>
> ide_complete_rq(drive, uptodate ? 0 : -EIO, nsectors << 9);
>
> line in cdrom_newpc_intr(). This way, we can copy back the sense data
> safely and then kill the rq.
Yeah, already have that in my patch.
> The only problem I fear with changes like that is that later some subtle
> interactions come about with some device which shouldn't normally
> happen. This is old code, you know, which still needs lots of scrubbing.
> It's like walking on a minefield :).
:-)
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists