[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E6F7D6.8010107@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:18:14 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] deal with interrupt shadow state for emulated instruction
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Why do we care? The guest can only harm itself, and if it wants to
>> disable interrupts, it would be a lot easier for it to run a plain 'cli'.
>>
>> I guess it would be a problem if we emulated 'mov ss' for ordinary
>> userspace or vm86 mode, but we don't.
>>
>>
>
> Well, the answer is that mov ss is an unprivileged instruction.
>
>
We don't emulate guest user mode.
Well, if guest userspace can convince its kernel to give it access to
some memory mapped I/O register, I guess it can execute repeated 'mov
ss, mmio' and starve the guest kernel.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists