[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090416005025.GA2779@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:50:25 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Fix quilt merge error in acpi-cpufreq.c
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > wouldn't you agree? Adding a "Impact: cleanup" wouldn't do
> > anything to it, except make it not read as good English any
> > more.
> >
> > I like seeing explanations that read well.
>
> Btw, I suspect that if the "Impact:" line is at the end, along
> with the "Signed-off-by:" etc lines, it wouldn't be as disturbing
> and I wouldn't react as negatively to it.
>
> At least then it wouldn't break up the narrative, and it would
> kind of fit with all the other "tagged" lines.
Yeah, that makes sense.
Or perhaps make it fit into the narrative but still have a
recognizable structure to make sure it cannot be forgotten?
Something like:
The impact of this change is that the build is fixed.
The impact of this change is that the code gets cleaner.
The impact of this change is that the CPU does not overheat.
although this sounds extremely artificial, circumvent and childish
to me :-/
I guess i'm infected with the "Impact: " language already and my
brain resists lingual inefficiencies ;-/ We've been using it for
almost a year meanwhile.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists