[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090416103258.GR9813@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:32:58 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc: djwong@...ibm.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot
even when ignore_ppc=0
* Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de> wrote:
> The *reevaluate* implies that the _PPC value has been
> evaluated/initialized by the OS already and Ingo's patch would be
> wrong then. I'd like to have a look at the T60's ACPI parts and
> find out what exactly (or if at all) makes _PPC to return sane
> values, I expect it's _PDC.
>
> Hmm, I could also imagine that Ingo's T60 patch is not needed
> anymore since Yakui's patch
> (0ac3c571315a53c14d2733564f14ebdb911fe903). This one could make
> sure that _PDC is evaluated first making the internal ACPI _PPC
> state initialize and makes sure _PPC gets only called afterwards.
>
> If this patch does not break Ingo's T60, I think this should go
> in. Due to Yakui's reordering/cleanup of ACPI function calls, I
> think also the notifier chain I introduced is not needed anymore
> and I can clean this up if I find some time.
Feel free to do so, if it's expected to work. I'll let you know if
it breaks the T60 box - i still have it in the -tip test mix.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists