linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0904161423240.22333@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:24:06 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
cc:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...e.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, r000n@...0n.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v3)


On Thursday 2009-04-16 14:12, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Wednesday 2009-04-15 23:07, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
>>>> Looks like there is some recursive path into ip_tables that makes the
>>>> per-cpu spinlock break.  I get lockup's with KVM networking.
>>>>
>>>> Suggestions?
>>> Well, it seems original patch was not so bad after all
>>>
>>> http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2006-January/023175.html
>>>
>>> So change per-cpu spinlocks to per-cpu rwlocks 
>>> and use read_lock() in ipt_do_table() to allow recursion...
>>>
>> iptables cannot quite recurse into itself due to the comefrom stuff.
>
> Actually it can by using the REJECT target:

Yes, but it has to return an absolute verdict (which REJECT does),
so it's not really a recursion, it's more like a goto without return.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/