lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:42:48 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with CREATE_TRACE_POINTS and recursion safety



On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:09:14PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I hate to do this because it adds some more work to the developer adding a 
> > new trace point header, but we could just remove the CREATE_TRACE_POINTS 
> > and do in the trace/events/*.h headers:
> > 
> > #ifdef CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS
> > #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> > #endif
> > 
> > in all tracepoint headers. I originally had it this way with just the 
> > CREATE_TRACE_POINTS, but Christoph Hellwig and Mathieu both suggested 
> > putting that into define_trace.h.  It seems so much cleaner to keep it in 
> > define_trace.h, but if it is causing too many headaches, it may not be 
> > worth it :-/
> 
> I still don't like the magic include in every trace header.
> 
> What about
> 
> #define CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS	"subsystem"
> 
> to only create them for a given subsystem?

I tried this. But it seems that there's no way to compare strings with the 
preprocessor. You can compare numbers, but having each subsystem define 
its own number would be a pain to manage.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ