[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090416152916.GA6004@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:29:17 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/filters: allow on-the-fly filter switching
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:54:13AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >>> Also, is filter_add_pred() supposed to be available for in-kernel
> >>> uses by other tracers or something?
> >> No, the current callers were the only ones I'd planned on (it's not
> >> static because code in trace_events.c needs to call it). But, do you
> >> see a use for it by other tracers?
> >
> >
> >
> > May be in the future, it's possible that a tracer might want to
> > set filters by itself.
> > But I don't think it has to be fixed now because there are nothing
> > like that for now.
> >
> > So, no problem :-)
> >
>
> If we restricted the mutex in trace_events_filters.c only, all the
> extern functions can be called without lock, and this is what I did
> in my previous patch.
Indeed, sounds better.
> >
> >>> If this is planned, the locking could be even deeper than my comments.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists