[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904160931.33419.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:31:33 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
Cc: p_gortmaker@...oo.com,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-ds1305: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.
On Wednesday 15 April 2009, Ben Nizette wrote:
>
> disable_irq() should wait for all running handlers to complete
> before returning. As such, if it's used to disable an interrupt
> from that interrupt's handler it will deadlock. This replaces
> the dangerous instances with the _nosync() variant which doesn't
> have this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Also ... it would be nice to convert this driver to the
new request_threaded_irq() infrastructure. The board I
had with this chip has a busted ttyS0 *input* line, so it's
not much use for development any more; or I'd update it
myself, it's a simple change. Someone with that hardware
should think about spending the few minutes needed to make
and test that patch.
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
> index fc372df..5c4f789 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ds1305_irq(int irq, void *p)
> {
> struct ds1305 *ds1305 = p;
>
> - disable_irq(irq);
> + disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> schedule_work(&ds1305->work);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> --
> 1.6.0.2
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists