[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090416165833.GA21704@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:58:33 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] remove the BKL: Replace BKL in mount/umount
syscalls with a mutex
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it> wrote:
>
> > Replace ths BKL in sys_mount()/sys_umount() syscalls with a regular mutex.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it>
> > ---
> > fs/namespace.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> > fs/super.c | 9 ++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Ok, this patch needs to be flamed^W commented on by Al.
>
> Al: this patch is very likely broken as i cannot imagine you
> leaving the BKL there just so. So lets accept that (and your NAK)
> as a given and not get upset about it too much.
>
> We are willing to fix any side effects and preconditions before
> this can be done [...]
this == remove the BKL. Not introduce a needless mutex like this
patch does.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists