[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904170409.02222.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:09:01 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ext3 data=guarded v3
On Thursday 16 April 2009 06:35:23 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Chris Mason wrote:
> >
> > Here is another version of the data=guarded work for ext3. The main
> > difference between this code and yesterday's is the guarded writepage
> > function now sends any newly allocated block through the old data=ordered code.
>
> I'm inclined to apply the first two patches as infrastructure, since they
> seem to make sense regardless of data=ordered. The ability to get a
> callback when IO ends sounds like something that a number of cases might
> find intriguing, and it's obviously how the actual IO has worked
> internally anyway.
>
> Comments?
I think also fscache really should be using proper read completed notifications
rather than hijacking the page lock waitqueue for this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists