[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904162156310.645@blonde.anvils>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:58:12 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, gregkh@...e.de, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, jmorris@...ei.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: pass correct mm when growing stack
Tetsuo Handa reports seeing the WARN_ON(current->mm == NULL) in
security_vm_enough_memory(), when do_execve() is touching the
target mm's stack, to set up its args and environment.
Yes, a UMH_NO_WAIT or UMH_WAIT_PROC call_usermodehelper() spawns
an mm-less kernel thread to do the exec. And in any case, that
vm_enough_memory check when growing stack ought to be done on the
target mm, not on the execer's mm (though apart from the warning,
it only makes a slight tweak to OVERCOMMIT_NEVER behaviour).
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
---
Commoner in 2.6.30-rc, but needs fixing in 2.6.28.N and 2.6.29.N too.
mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 2.6.30-rc2/mm/mmap.c 2009-04-08 18:20:25.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/mm/mmap.c 2009-04-16 20:31:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -1575,7 +1575,7 @@ static int acct_stack_growth(struct vm_a
* Overcommit.. This must be the final test, as it will
* update security statistics.
*/
- if (security_vm_enough_memory(grow))
+ if (security_vm_enough_memory_mm(mm, grow))
return -ENOMEM;
/* Ok, everything looks good - let it rip */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists