[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090416015826.GA2413@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:58:27 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
hskinnemoen@...el.com, kernel@...32linux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imre.deak@...ia.com, mingo@...e.hu,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ads7846: fix unsafe disable_irq (was [REGRESSION]
threaded interrupt handler support breaks (some) irq handling on
AVR32)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:41:57AM +1000, Ben Nizette wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 09:57 +0200, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > Shouldn't that be disable_irq_nosync()?
>
> Indeed, good catch. That fixes it.
>
> --------------8<--------------------
>
> The use of disable_irq inside the handler for the interrupt being
> disabled has always been dangerous. disable_irq should wait for that
> handler to complete before returning -> deadlock.
>
> For some reason this wasn't actually the case until 3aa551c9b was merged
> but since this time, the ads7846 driver has deadlocked the system on
> first interrupt.
>
> Convert the driver to use the handler-safe _nosync variant.
>
Applied, thank you very much Ben.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists