[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E69E76.9030608@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:56:54 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...stic.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] tracing: create automated trace defines
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Is your only problem the fact that tracepoints include rcupdate.h ?
No. That was the first roadblock, which caused massive cyclic
dependencies between includes and consequent failure to define
everything required. I solved that by pushing __DO_TRACE out of line.
Everything since then is a separate issue.
> This
> can easily be solved by moving rcu_read_(un)lock_sched_notrace to a
> rcu-update-<insert meaningful name here> and include this header in
> rcupdate.h and tracepoint.h.
>
I suppose, but I think pushing __do_trace_##name out of line is cleaner
anyway. And I think it's very important that tracepoint.h have a
*absolutely minimal* #include set, so that it can be safely included in
as many contexts as possible. asm/paravirt.h is complex enough as it
is, and I really don't want tracepoint bringing in any extra headers at
all. linux/types.h is about the only acceptable one.
> If by doing these modifications we succeed in keeping the "void"
> parameters working _and_ make your stuff to compile, I think we would
> have done something great. :-)
>
The void issue is irritating, but relatively minor compared to the
rest. If everything else gets solved except for the need to pass a
dummy param to no-arg tracepoints, then I think it'll be a generally
useful facility.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists