[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090417014209.GA24956@Krystal>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:42:09 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] RCU move trace defines to rcupdate_types.h
* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> > I don't think this helps. rcupdate_types.h uses preempt_disable/enable, but
> > doesn't include linux/preempt.h for them - but someone's going to have to, so
> > you've got an implicit dependency on the user to #include the right headers in
> > advance.
>
> Would including linux/preempt.h in rcupdate_types.h be a problem?
>
> -- Steve
>
I did not include preempt.h in rcupdate_types.h because rcupdate.h did
not include it, so I thought it had a special status such a kernel.h.
However, I notice the rcupdate.h includes spinlock.h, which in turn
includes preempt.h, so we would need to include preempt.h in
rcupdate_types.h.
But I think preempt.h is pretty much only type definitions. I don't
think that would be a problem, but maybe Jeremy knows better.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists