[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d3f23370904162201s21fc7d90q8bc4aacafa5a7ada@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:21 +1000
From: John Williams <john.williams@...alogix.com>
To: microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Subject: Re: [microblaze-uclinux] [PATCH 11/11] microblaze: Kconfig: Enable
drivers for Microblaze
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:56 PM, <monstr@...str.eu> wrote:
> From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
ACK from a MicroBlaze perspective, but some other comments below:
A note more for the Xilinx PPC folks (ie Grant Likely):
Shouldn't some of these Kconfig depends for PPC be unified? We have:
> config XILINX_SYSACE
> tristate "Xilinx SystemACE support"
> - depends on 4xx
> + depends on 4xx || MICROBLAZE
> config XILINX_HWICAP
> tristate "Xilinx HWICAP Support"
> - depends on XILINX_VIRTEX
> + depends on XILINX_VIRTEX || MICROBLAZE
> config GPIO_XILINX
> bool "Xilinx GPIO support"
> - depends on PPC_OF
> + depends on PPC_OF || MICROBLAZE
> help
> Say yes here to support the Xilinx FPGA GPIO device
Are these all really different options? PPC_OF? XILINX_VIRTEX? 4xx?
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists