[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090417063702.GA16744@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:37:02 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: use BIO list management functions
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 03:32:17PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> Impact: cleanup
I though we had pretty broad agreement that these lines are utter crap?
:)
> static void loop_add_bio(struct loop_device *lo, struct bio *bio)
> {
> - if (lo->lo_biotail) {
> - lo->lo_biotail->bi_next = bio;
> - lo->lo_biotail = bio;
> - } else
> - lo->lo_bio = lo->lo_biotail = bio;
> + bio_list_add(&lo->lo_bio_list, bio);
> }
This function only has one caller, no need to keep it.
> static struct bio *loop_get_bio(struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> - struct bio *bio;
> -
> - if ((bio = lo->lo_bio)) {
> - if (bio == lo->lo_biotail)
> - lo->lo_biotail = NULL;
> - lo->lo_bio = bio->bi_next;
> - bio->bi_next = NULL;
> - }
> -
> - return bio;
> + return bio_list_pop(&lo->lo_bio_list);
> }
Same here.
> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static inline int bio_has_data(struct bio *bio)
> }
>
> /*
> - * BIO list managment for use by remapping drivers (e.g. DM or MD).
> + * BIO list management for use by remapping drivers (e.g. DM or MD) and loop.
> *
I don't think this needs changing, that was just examples.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists