linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] io-throttle documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090417102539.GA16838@linux>
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:25:40 +0200
From:	Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>
To:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>, agk@...rceware.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk, baramsori72@...il.com,
	Carl Henrik Lunde <chlunde@...g.uio.no>,
	dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...gle.com>,
	eric.rannaud@...il.com, fernando@....ntt.co.jp,
	Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@...inux.co.jp>, matt@...ehost.com,
	dradford@...ehost.com, ngupta@...gle.com, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
	roberto@...it.it, Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>,
	Satoshi UCHIDA <s-uchida@...jp.nec.com>,
	subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] io-throttle documentation

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:56:31AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:21:12 +0200
> > Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> +Example:
> >> +* Create an association between an io-throttle group and a bio-cgroup group
> >> +  with "bio" and "blockio" subsystems mounted in different mount points:
> >> +  # mount -t cgroup -o bio bio-cgroup /mnt/bio-cgroup/
> >> +  # cd /mnt/bio-cgroup/
> >> +  # mkdir bio-grp
> >> +  # cat bio-grp/bio.id
> >> +  1
> >> +  # mount -t cgroup -o blockio blockio /mnt/io-throttle
> >> +  # cd /mnt/io-throttle
> >> +  # mkdir foo
> >> +  # echo 1 > foo/blockio.bio_id
> > 
> > Why do we need multiple cgroups at once to track I/O ?
> > Seems complicated to me.
> > 
> 
> IIUC, it also disallows other subsystems to be binded with blockio subsys:
>   # mount -t cgroup -o blockio cpuset xxx /mnt
>   (failed)
> 
> and if a task is moved from cg1(id=1) to cg2(id=2) in bio subsys, this task
> will be moved from CG1(id=1) to CG2(id=2) automatically in blockio subsys.
> 
> All these are odd, unexpected, complex and bug-prone I think..

Implementing bio-cgroup functionality as pure infrastructure framework
instead of a cgroup subsystem would remove all this oddity and
complexity.

For example, the actual functionality that I need for the io-throttle
controller is just an interface to set and get the cgroup owner of a
page. I think it should be the same also for other potential users of
bio-cgroup.

So, what about implementing the bio-cgroup functionality as cgroup "page
tracking" infrastructure and provide the following interfaces:

/*
 * Encode the cgrp->css.id in page_group->flags
 */
void set_cgroup_page_owner(struct page *page, struct cgroup *cgrp);

/*
 * Returns the cgroup owner of a page, decoding the cgroup id from
 * page_cgroup->flags.
 */
struct cgroup *get_cgroup_page_owner(struct page *page);

This also wouldn't increase the size of page_cgroup because we can
encode the cgroup id in the unused bits of page_cgroup->flags, as
originally suggested by Kame.

And I think it could be used also by dm-ioband, even if it's not a
cgroup-based subsystem... but I may be wrong. Ryo what's your opinion?

-Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/