[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E866E7.7070507@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:24:23 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [28/28] x86: MCE: Implement new status bits
Andi Kleen wrote:
> static struct severity {
> u64 mask;
> u64 result;
> unsigned char sev;
> unsigned char mcgmask;
> unsigned char mcgres;
> + unsigned char ser;
> + unsigned char context;
> char *msg;
> } severities[] = {
> +#define KERNEL .context = IN_KERNEL
> +#define USER .context = IN_USER
> +#define SER .ser = 1
> +#define NOSER .ser = -1
ser is unsigned or signed?
> int mce_severity(struct mce *a, int tolerant, char **msg)
> {
> struct severity *s;
> @@ -51,11 +101,14 @@
> continue;
> if ((a->mcgstatus & s->mcgmask) != s->mcgres)
> continue;
> - if (s->sev > MCE_NO_SEVERITY && (a->status & MCI_STATUS_UC) &&
> - tolerant < 1)
> - return MCE_PANIC_SEVERITY;
> + if ((s->ser == 1 && !mce_ser) || (s->ser == -1 && mce_ser))
> + continue;
> + if (s->context && error_context(a) != s->context)
> + continue;
> if (msg)
> *msg = s->msg;
> + if (s->context == IN_KERNEL && panic_on_oops)
> + return MCE_PANIC_SEVERITY;
> return s->sev;
> }
> }
Where did you throw away the statements for "tolerant < 1"?
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists