[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904171240450.14919@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:41:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tracing/events: add rcu locking around trace event
prints
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
> > I haven't been following all of the e-mail threads about the include
> > hell problem; what are the issues, exactly? What's the problem with
> > simply including <linux/rcuupdate.h>, and any needed prequisites in
> > ftrace.h?
>
> I'm adding tracing support to paravirt.h, which in turn gets included in
> various low-level arch/x86 headers. If it starts including other high-level
> linux/ headers, we quickly get into deep #include recursion problems and
> undefined symbols.
I think our final solution of the:
#ifdef CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS
#undef CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/define_trace.h>
#endif
would fix this for us.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists